Monday, 17 February 2014

Hadassah - Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection

A quick Hadassah update:
Firstly we were told today that the Anglo-Saxon (ie English) term for the process we are in would be Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The deal is that the court appointed executors can impose deals for 3 months on the workers, management and creditors.
After 3 months there are three possible outcomes:
1) everyone agrees to a deal to save Hadassah
2) the Chapter 11 is extended
3) full breakup or bankruptcy of Hadassah. Effectively all the staff lose our jobs and can be Re-employed if the new management chooses and with any terms they choose.

The Chapter 11 was introduced when the hospital could no longer even buy good or basic medicines for her inpatients. Things were pretty desperate.

We are hoping to receive an advance on next months salary I'm the next few days (it is illegal to give us the second half of our January salaries under Chapter 11 terms). That won't be our full salary.
There are however some conditions we are demanding before we give up the strike. These include:
Adequate medical liability insurance cover.
Payment to the Palestinian doctors (they are paid separately and have done even worse than us)
Continued recruitment of trainees as needed.
Plus done other small points.

When the strike will end is still unclear

Hadassah Updates

After the suggestion of a friend (thanks Arieh), and as a chance to keep some of my non-FaceBook family up to date on what's going on, I thought I'd post some of my recent FB updates to this blog. They are probably shorter and less well thought out than I would normally feel proud to post, but things at Hadassah have been evolving rapidly, and maybe quality can be replaced by timeliness.

I've also tried to back-date them, so please look back over a few posts.

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

Hadassah - Tax and pensions money going missing

It turns out that my employer has been deducting my pension contributions, Keren Hishtalmut (a government matched saving scheme) and Income Tax (PAYE) from my salary each month...

...and then pocketing it instead of handing it to the Tax Office and Pension Company!!

I can hardly come up with words to describe what I think. This is the behaviour of big fraudsters like Maxwell and Meddof, not a public hospital!

Tuesday, 11 February 2014

Hadassah - No Medical Liability Insurance

The situation at Hadassah is going from bad to worse. 
As you may know, we have been running a "weekend service", of reduced staff and treating emergencies only, for the last week. 
A decision yesterday by the courts that freezes our debts may also leave us all uninsured against medical malpractice. We are waiting for final confirmation, but in that situation none of the doctors can continue working at all. (In Israel, unlike the UK, you don't have private MDU/MPS insurance - it's all through the work place).

In that case, I have no idea what happens to our several hundred in-patients

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

Hadassah in Crisis

It’s been a long time since I wrote anything, and in truth that was because life has trundled on, at a pleasant enough pace, with nothing hugely eventful to describe.
But today some strange things have been going on at Hadassah Hospital, so here goes:

Last night it emerged that the Finance Ministry has applied to the courts to put Hadassah into some sort of administration.
All Hadassah’s debts ($200m of them) will be cancelled. That’s the good news.
The bad news for us is that those debts include the salary they owe us for our work in January. In other words, we won’t be paid for this past month.
They also will enforce a 10% pay cut on all doctors, nurses and non-clinical staff. The pay cuts are likely to be even higher for doctors who do private work in the hospital.

As a result, the doctors committee declared a strike: from today we will reduce to weekend skeleton staffing levels, with operating theatres only doing emergency, cancer and obstetric surgery. Even that work is likely to be unpaid, with no guarantee that the “weekend” on-call team will ever see any salary for their time.

The impact on Jerusalem could be bad. There are three hospitals in West Jerusalem – Hadassah Ein Karem (the big teaching centre to the west), Sha’arei Tzedek (towards the centre) and Hadassah Mt Scopus (near East Jerusalem). Two of those are Hadassah owned and affected by the strike. That means that the only hospitals providing neurosurgery (including neurological major trauma), plastics and burns, liver transplants and whole bunch of other services, for the 1.2m inhabitants of Jerusalem plus significant amounts of the West Bank, are going to be effectively closed.

That’s the objective facts.

The question is how did we got to this situation?
Over the last few decades Hadassah has been haemorrhaging money, especially after negotiating a very bad deal with the HMOs for reimbursement. We just about survived due to the generosity of the Hadassah Women’s Organisation in the US. But after Madoff the HWO said they could no longer support our running costs and we started running up debts.

Last spring our Chief Exec resigned and a new guy called Avigdor Kaplan arrived. As far as I could see he acted decisively, proposing voluntary 5% cuts in salary for all employees to save the hospital, plus the loss of 200 jobs. The doctors committee reluctantly agreed; the nurses agreed to 2.5%, the workers committee (non-clinical) refused and went on strike. During that strike the picketed the hospital and even physically assaulted doctors who crossed the line to treat their patients.

It was clear there would be repercussions, and since then we have had several months were we were paid 80%, 50% and 50% of our salary on time, with the rest arriving later. But it always arrived.

No we are in a position where even that may not be happening.

In addition, Hadassah doctors had various forms of grant money held in hospital bank accounts. That includes research grants, personal grants awarded to Junior Doctors from the government, and funds from private practice. All those grants have recently been simply taken by the hospital into the central pot.

What about the future?
My fear is that the government will consider the things that make Hadassah great, to be non-affordable luxuries. Things like support for research, both financial and in terms of flexible working hours; good salaries (many doctors earned better than they would in purely government hospitals) etc.
These (especially the research) were also the reasons that I chose Hadassah over other hospitals.

Hadassah used to be known to be the best hospital in Israel by a mile. The heads of every anaesthesia department in the country were trained at Hadassah. That reputation has been slipping for close to a decade, and we now have very stiff competition from a number of places, but we felt that with determination we could regain/retain the top position.  However there is a real risk Hadassah may be stripped bare now, and become little more than a DGH.

That would be a shame for everyone.


For the moment we have been asked to remain loyal to Hadassah, and I will respect that request. I’m in the fortunate position of not having a family to support, and not having to worry about where my next meal will come from. But having said all that, when I moved to Israel, I came to the best place I could find to learn anaesthesia at the highest level Israel could offer, and perhaps contribute to medical research at that centre. If Hadassah ceases to be that place, a lot of us will start to wonder if our dreams can be fulfilled elsewhere.

Friday, 2 August 2013

A momentous day, and a question of Consent

I can’t start this posting without first mentioning my huge pride in my little sister, Becca.
On Wednesday, Becca is due to marry Ron, a wonderful man who everyone in the family adores. Now you might imagine that for the last weeks leading up to the wedding she has been focussing on all the planning for such a momentous event. In fact, she has been sitting university exams in architecture, and excelling: scoring in the top ranks of her year-group including a recent 100%. And as if that’s not enough, she decided to make her own wedding dress, because life just isn’t sufficiently busy.
But her trailblazing isn’t new. Becca was the first member of our family to make aliyah, about 5 years ago, and being our here without family, and initially without a job, had the most challenging time of it. She showed it could be done, which was no small part in encouraging the rest of us to give it a go.





I wanted to find a link to the other thing I’ve been thinking about, but I can’t so apologies for the clash in theme.

The question I had was why is there such a difference in attitudes in consent in the UK vs. Israel?

I first noticed this when I opened a bank account. In Jerusalem, I was asked to sign about 13 pages of forms, each one with dense text. When I asked what I was signing, or for an English copy, I never got a proper answer, except that it is necessary to get an account. I know that in the UK we do also sign saying “we have read the terms and conditions”, but that seems less frightening than signing 13 pages individually, each confirming that I giving away some other right.

This would all be no more than an intellectual curiosity, except that I’ve found it’s started to affect how I explain anaesthesia to patients at work.

So compare the way one surgeon tried to consent my patient, in the theatres reception:
“You want anaesthesia? Please sign here.”
(handing patient a page of dense A4 text listing all the risks of GA, including everything from pain to Malignant Hyperthermia and Death)

..to the way the nice young British immigrant doctor (Yours Truly) put it:
“Now to explain what will happen in the OR. (explanation of arriving, getting oxygen mask, IV line and drugs to go to sleep, followed by wake up in the Recovery Ward).

“I have here the anaesthetic consent form. It lists all the very rare things that can occasionally happen under GA. I know it may sound frightening but anaesthesia is extremely safe nowadays.

“If after the operation you feel pain or nausea please let us know and we will give you extra medicines to help with that. Other than that, the much rarer things that occasionally happen in anaesthesia are:
Damage to teeth
Vomiting
Aspiration of vomit
Damage to Lungs;
Heart;
Liver;
Kidneys;
Allergies to medication
One in several thousand remember their surgery despite GA
One in 250,000 don’t wake up from anaesthesia, which is extremely rare.

Do you have any questions or anything I can explain better?
If you’re happy to go ahead, would you mind signing here and dating here.”

By the end of this, the patient is starting at my wide-eyed (literally. Do you know that people’s eyes genuinely do go wide when they are afraid?)

They all sign, but I never feel that I have eased their medical journey.

I have tried different wording; being humorous; likening the odds to crossing the street (which is a bit of a lie, I have no idea what the one-off risk of crossing a road, but I suspect it is actually less than 1:250,000). None of this works for me. They all seem petrified.

Is it a kindness to put them through this? And will it ultimately make any difference? After all, they are signing the same document that includes these risks and more. In other words, can ignorance be bliss?


I will keep experimenting with other ways of saying the same thing, and who knows, maybe some day I’ll find the magic formulae for an informed, confident and happy patient.

Friday, 1 February 2013

UN Human Rights Commission Report


Just read this article in Ha'aretz about the new UN report on the settlements:
http://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politics/1.1920000

It is undoubtedly true that the UN Human Rights Commission is a joke. That it is full of countries with atrocious human rights records, and that it is more than a little bizarre the way that it focusses on Israel, rather than far more serious violations elsewhere.

However, there is still the possibility that they occasionally will speak the truth.

The settlements are unfortunately a breach of international law, because you are not allowed to transfer your population into "occupied territory". Israel has no choice but to consider the territory to be "occupied" because we don't can't extend the vote to the hostile palestinian population, but to call it Israel and not give them the vote would be true apartheid.

Worse than that: settlements seem to be the only weak spot Israel has with regards to the International Criminal Court (this was pointed out to me by an Israel lawyer friend). The ICC only intervenes if the local country's legal system is unwilling or unable to investigate a case. We have shown that we can prosecute our politicians (normally for fraud or rape), that we can prosecute soldiers in the cases of them violating human rights, but the courts have never looked at the legality of *all* settlements, and are unlikely to be able to do so. So the ICC is in a strong position to step in.

In the end, I am confident we will solve the problem in the West Bank, and withdraw from most of it:
We may do it through a negotiated settlement, having found a "partner" who can deliver.
We may do it because our conscience as a people compels it.
We may do it under pressure from foreign governments and international bodies, friendly and less friendly.
We may do it due to some economic and social boycott, similar to that seen against South Africa.
We may do it in the face of a serious uprising, unwilling to pay the cost in lives, as we did in Lebanon.

I hope for my country sake that we pick our time well, and leave under the best possible circumstances.

Shabbat Shalom